4.5 Article

Yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) followed by BEAM (Z-BEAM) conditioning regimen and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in relapsed or refractory high-risk B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL): a single institution Italian experience

期刊

ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 97, 期 9, 页码 1619-1626

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-018-3328-3

关键词

Autologous stem cell transplantation; Aggressive refractory NHL; Zevalin

资金

  1. Roche
  2. Celgene
  3. Janssen
  4. Takeda
  5. Gilead

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemo-refractory NHL has a very poor outcome; the addiction of RIT to salvage regiment pre ASCT had recently demonstrated promising results.We performed a retrospective sequential study to determine the feasibility of standard Zevalin with BEAM in high-risk relapse/refractory NHL. A matched cohort analysis with a group treated with standard BEAM without Zevalin was performed as secondary endpoint. Between October 2006 and January 2013, 37 NHL patients at high risk for progression or early (< 1 year) or multiple relapses were treated with Z-BEAM and ASCT after R-DHAP or R-ICE as salvage therapy. Clinical characteristics were 19 refractory and 18 early or multiple relapse; 16 patients received 1, and 21 had 2 or more previous rituximab-containing chemotherapy. At the end of treatment, response was CR 22 (59%), PR 10 (27%), PD 4 (11%), and toxic death (TD) 1 (3%). With a median follow up of 61 months, 3-year PFS was 61% and OS 61%. Fifteen patients died, 12 of lymphoma. Comparison with 21 treated with BEAM alone showed a numerical higher 3-yr PFS rate in favor of Z-BEAM but not statistically significant (57 vs 48%). With the limitation of the small sample subgroup analysis, a significant benefit was observed in relapsed patients for PFS (78% Z-BEAM vs 22% BEAM p = 0.016) and OS (83% Z-BEAM vs 22% BEAM p = 0.001). In relapsed/refractory high-risk NHL, Z-BEAM+ASCT is able to achieve a good ORR. Three-year PFS is promising for early relapsed patients but is not satisfactory for those with refractory disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据