4.5 Article

Female reproductive factors and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality among women: The Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study (JPHC study)

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 28, 期 9, 页码 597-604

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.06.001

关键词

Mortality; Parity; Breastfeeding; Menarche; Menopause; Prospective Studies; Cohort Studies; Japan

资金

  1. National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund [23-A-31(toku), 26-A-2]
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan
  3. AMED-WISE, the Project for Whole Implementation to Support and Ensure the Female Life, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We investigated the association between reproductive history and mortality from all and major causes among Japanese women. Methods: A large-scale population-based cohort study in Japan included 40,149 eligible women aged 40-69 years in 1990-1994. A total of 4788 deaths were reported during follow-up (average 20.9 years). A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for all-cause and major causes of mortality, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Inverse associations with all-cause mortality were found in parous women (0.74 [0.67-0.82]), women with two or three births compared with a single birth (2 births: 0.88 [0.78-0.99]; 3 births: 0.83 [0.74-0.94]), parous women who breastfed (0.81 [0.75-0.87]), women who were older at menopause (0.88 [0.80-0.97]; p-trend: <0.01), and women who had a longer fertility span (0.85 [0.76-0.95]; p-trend: <0.01). A positive association was seen between all-cause mortality and later age at first birth (>= 30 years) than early childbearing (<= 22 years). Conclusions: Our study suggests that parous, two or three births, breastfeeding, late age at menopause, and longer reproductive span are associated with lower risk of all-cause of mortality. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据