4.5 Article

Enhanced In Vivo Bone and Blood Vessel Formation by Iron Oxide and Silica Doped 3D Printed Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds

期刊

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 46, 期 9, 页码 1241-1253

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-018-2040-8

关键词

3D printing; Porous scaffold; Interconnected porosity; Tricalcium phosphate; In vivo behavior; Osteogenesis and angiogenesis; Accelerated bone defect healing

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AR066361]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR066361] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcium phosphate (CaP) ceramics show significant promise towards bone graft applications because of the compositional similarity to inorganic materials of bone. With 3D printing, it is possible to create ceramic implants that closely mimic the geometry of human bone and can be custom-designed for unusual injuries or anatomical sites. The objective of the study was to optimize the 3D-printing parameters for the fabrication of scaffolds, with complex geometry, made from synthesized tricalcium phosphate (TCP) powder. This study was also intended to elucidate the mechanical and biological effects of the addition of Fe+3 and Si+4 in TCP implants in a rat distal femur model for 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Doped with Fe+3 and Si+4 TCP scaffolds with 3D interconnected channels were fabricated to provide channels for micronutrients delivery and improved cellmaterial interactions through bioactive fixation. Addition of Fe+3 into TCP enhanced early-stage new bone formation by increasing type I collagen production. Neovascularization was observed in the Si+4 doped samples after 12 weeks. These findings emphasize that the additive manufacturing of scaffolds with complex geometry from synthesized ceramic powder with modified chemistry is feasible and may serve as a potential candidate to introduce angiogenic and osteogenic properties to CaPs, leading to accelerated bone defect healing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据