4.2 Review

Therapies for triple negative breast cancer

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 983-998

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1032246

关键词

basal-like breast cancer; BRCA mutations; poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor; phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase pathway; platinums; triple negative breast cancer

资金

  1. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  2. National Cancer Institute [CA077263]
  3. Genentech
  4. Roche
  5. Eisai
  6. Pfizer
  7. Celgene
  8. Celldex Therapeutics
  9. Eli Lilly

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease associated with a high risk of recurrence, and therapeutic options are currently limited to cytotoxic therapy. Germ-line mutations may occur in up to 20% of unselected patients with TNBC, which may serve as a biomarker identifying which patients may have tumors that are particularly sensitive to platinums and/or inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. A substantial proportion of patients with TNBCs not associated with germ-line BRCA mutations may have tumors that are *'BRCA-like', rendering those individuals potential candidates for similar strategies. Areas covered: The purpose of this review is to highlight the current standard and experimental treatment strategies. Expert opinion: Recent research that has illuminated the molecular heterogeneity of the disease rationalizes its diverse biological behavior and differential response to chemotherapy. Modern technology platforms provide molecular signatures that can be mined for therapeatic interventions. Target pathways that are commonly dysregulated in cancer cells control cellular processes such as apoptosis, proliferation, angiogenesis, DNA repair, cell cycle progression, immune modulation and invasion, and metastasis. Novel trial design and re-defined endpoints as surrogates to clinical outcome have been introduced to expedite the development of breakthrough therapies to treat high-risk early-stage breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据