4.5 Article

Quantity discrimination by treefrogs

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 61-69

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.03.005

关键词

Hyla intermedia; numerical abilities; quantity discrimination; speede-accuracy trade-off

资金

  1. DOR grant from Universita di Padova

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To make foraging, reproductive and antipredator decisions, animals often have to discriminate discrete and continuous quantities (numbers and sizes of objects, respectively). Few studies have investigated discrete quantity discrimination in amphibians, but this has been done only in the context of prey selection. Using a species with arboreal habits, the Italian treefrog, Hyla intermedia, we investigated whether amphibians discriminate both discrete and continuous quantities when choosing between microhabitats. In field experiments, we showed that newly metamorphosed treefrogs exhibit a preference for microhabitats with abundant and tall grass. In the laboratory, treefrogs presented with the dichotomous choice between two sets comprising different numbers of vertical green bars (simulating grass clumps) showed a preference for the larger set and discriminated between 1 and 2 bars and between 2 and 4 bars, but not between 2 and 3 bars and between 3 and 4 bars. When presented with two bars of different size (i.e. one bar was taller and wider), treefrogs preferred the larger bar up to a 0.25 surface area ratio. Control experiments suggested that treefrogs represent numbers rather than continuous variables to discriminate between sets of bars and that they use the height but not the width of the bars to discriminate sizes. We also found evidence of a possible trade-off between speed and accuracy: individuals that chose more quickly did not display a significant preference for the larger bar/set of bars. These findings suggest that for amphibians, as for other vertebrates, a variety of decision-making processes can rely on quantitative abilities. (C) 2018 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据