4.8 Article

From Linear to Angular Isomers: Achieving Tunable Charge Transport in Single-Crystal Indolocarbazoles Through Delicate Synergetic CH/NH Interactions

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 57, 期 29, 页码 8875-8880

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201713288

关键词

intermolecular interactions; electron and hole mobility; organic field-effect transistors; organic single crystals; structure-property relationship

资金

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education via AcRF [RG125/4, MOE2014-T2-1-132]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFB0401100, 2013CB933403, 2013CB933504]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51633006, 91222203, 91233205, 91433115]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB12030300]
  5. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore, under its Campus of Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Weak intermolecular interaction in organic semiconducting molecular crystals plays an important role in molecular packing and electronic properties. Here, four five-ring-fused isomers were rationally designed and synthesized to investigate the isomeric influence of linear and angular shapes in affecting their molecular packing and resultant electronic properties. Single-crystal field-effect transistors showed mobility order of 5,7-ICZ (3.61cm(2)V(-1)s(-1)) >5,11-ICZ (0.55cm(2)V(-1)s(-1)) >11,12-ICZ (ca. 10(-5)cm(2)V(-1)s(-1)) and 5,12-ICZ (ca. 10(-6)cm(2)V(-1)s(-1)). Theoretical calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) and polaron transport model revealed that 5,7-ICZ can reach higher mobilities than the others thanks to relatively higher hole transfer integral that links to stronger intermolecular interaction due to the presence of multiple NH and CH(py) interactions with energy close to common NHN hydrogen bonds, as well as overall lower hole-vibrational coupling owing to the absence of coupling of holes to low frequency modes due to better conjugation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据