4.3 Editorial Material

Short-term impacts of sodium/glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in Japanese clinical practice: considerations for their appropriate use to avoid serious adverse events

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 795-800

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2015.1034105

关键词

dehydration; hypoglycemia; serious adverse events; sodium/glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors; urogenital infections

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25860748] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sodium/glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) represent a novel class of glucose-lowering agents that lower plasma glucose levels through pharmacological inhibition of glucose reuptake from the kidney, independent of insulin secretion and action. Clinical trials of SGLT2i demonstrated therapeutic benefits on glycemic control and bodyweight in individuals with type 2 diabetes, with few cases of serious adverse events (SAEs). However, a considerable number of SAEs were reported in patients receiving SGLT2i clinically in Japan during the first 3 months of their use. These included urogenital infections, hypoglycemia and dehydration. Unexpectedly, serious skin and subcutaneous disorders, mainly reported as generalized rash or skin eruption, were prominent in patients receiving SGLT2i, but with unknown mechanisms. There is also concern for potential SAEs associated with chronic SGLT2i administration, especially in the non-obese type 2 diabetes characterized by reduced insulin secretion often seen in East Asia. Chronic SAEs may include severe hypoglycemia due to depletion of hepatic glycogen storage, acceleration of diabetes-associated sarcopenia and ketosis/ketoacidosis. The current information on acute SAEs confirms the importance of caution in the appropriate use of SGLT2i. Furthermore, careful long-term observation of patients receiving SGLT2i is essential to avoid SAEs and for better clinical use of this drug class.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据