4.3 Review

Trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity in elderly women with HER-2-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis of real-world data

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 1661-1671

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2015.1089231

关键词

breast cancer; cardiac events or toxicity; elderly patient; meta-analysis; trastuzumab

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the overall risk of cardiac toxicity associated with trastuzumab treatment in elderly breast cancer patients. Methods: We searched databases from PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials to identify relevant studies. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the incidence rate, overall hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs using a fixed effects model. Results: A total of 116,342 and 360 elderly patients from five cohort studies and two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included for analysis. The pooled incidences of symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF) and CHF/HF/CM were 6.4% (95% CI 4.1% - 9.4) and 16.4% (95% CI 16.19% - 16.61) in patients with median age of 67.5 years from two RCTs and in patients with median age of 67.5 (60 - 75), 71 (66 - 80+), 74.5 (65 - 89), 75 (66 - 81+) and 79.5 (60 - 99) from five cohort studies, respectively. Trastuzumab was significantly correlated with an increased risk of defined cardiac toxicities in five cohort studies (HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.72 - 2.07, p < 0.00001) and two RCTs (HR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.71, 5.26, p < 0.00001). Sub-group analysis showed that the anthracycline-based chemotherapy increased the risk of CHF/HF and CM in patients among five cohort studies (HR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.8 - 1.87, p < 0.00001). Conclusion: Trastuzumab is likely associated with an increased risk of cardiac toxicity in elderly patients with HER-2-positive breast cancer. Carefully monitoring cardiac function in elderly patients receiving trastuzumab, particularly with concurrent use of anthracycline, is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据