4.2 Article

Immunological Behavior Analysis of Muscle Cells under IFN- Stimulation in Vitro and in Vivo

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ar.23834

关键词

C2C12 cells; immunology; skeletal muscle; inflammation; IFN-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81371924, 81572102]
  2. National Key Research and Development Plan [2017YFC1105003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Muscle cells could serve as antigen-presenting cells, and participate in the activation of immune response. Immunological characteristics of muscle cells, and their capacities to equip themselves with immunorelevant molecules, remain to be elucidated. In this study, we investigated the immunological properties of myoblasts and differentiated myotubes in vitro and in vivo, under the IFN- induced inflammatory condition. We found that the fused C2C12 myotubes are more sensitive to inflammatory stimulation, and significantly upregulated the expression levels of MHC-I/II and TLR3/7 molecules, than that of proliferated myoblasts. As well, some co-stimulatory/-inhibitory molecules, including CD40, CD86, ICAM-I, ICOS-L, and PD-L1, were prominently upregulated in IFN- induced myotubes. Notably, we detected the protein levels of ASC, NLRP3, and Caspase-1 increased in stimulated myotubes, and IL-1 in cell culture supernatant, implying the activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes in IFN- treated myotubes. The pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines mRNA levels in IFN- induced C2C12 myotubes and myoblasts, involving IL-1, IL-6, and MCP-1, increased markedly. T cell activation test further verified IFN- induced C2C12 myotubes prompt to the proliferation of the splenic CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. In Cardiotoxin-damaged tibialis anterior (TA) muscle, some regenerated myofibers expressed both MHC class I and class II molecules under IFN- enhanced inflammatory condition. Thus, our work demonstrates that muscle cells are active participants of local immune reactions. Anat Rec, 301:1551-1563, 2018. (c) 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据