4.6 Article

Quantification of estrogens in infant formulas by isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 10, 期 32, 页码 3968-3975

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ay01101j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21771019, 21005074]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds of the National Institute of Metrology, China [21-AKY1619]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [buctrc201706]
  4. Key Laboratory of Applied Surface and Colloid Chemistry, Ministry of Education (Shaanxi Normal University) [2017028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Steroid estrogens, such as estrone (E1), 17-estradiol (E2) and estriol (E3), have been shown to exhibit potentially adverse effects on the health of children. Consequently, it is highly desirable to develop detection approaches for rapid and accurate determination of steroid estrogens in infant formulas. In this study, a robust method based on isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID LC-MS/MS) was developed to simultaneously measure E1, E2 and E3 in infant formulas with no need for any derivatization step. The desired simplicity, accuracy and specificity were achieved via a facile sample pretreatment process, including protein precipitation and clean-up steps. The limits of quantification were 0.0025, 0.005 and 0.005 g kg(-1) for E1, E2 and E3, respectively. Besides, a recovery of 92.3-102.7% was obtained with a relative standard deviation of less than 6%. Furthermore, both accurate values for the target analytes ranging from 0.005 to 50 g kg(-1) and a corresponding expanded relative uncertainty of less than 12% were obtained using the ID LC-MS/MS method. More importantly, the approach is highly sensitive, selective and accurate in screening estrogens in real infant formula samples. Thus, it could be convenient for large-scale application due to its derivatization-free feature and simplicity in sample preparation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据