4.8 Article

Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Tumor Exosomes Based on Aptamer Recognition-Induced Multi-DNA Release and Cyclic Enzymatic Amplification

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 90, 期 7, 页码 4507-4513

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04863

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [21375063, 21575069, 21675088, 21335004]
  2. Program for Outstanding Innovation Research Team of Universities in Jiangsu Province
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sensitive and specific detection of tumor exosomes is of great significance for early cancer diagnosis. In this paper, we report an aptamer strategy for exosome detection based on aptamer recognition induced multi-DNA release and cyclic enzymatic amplification. First, we use aptamer magnetic bead bioconjugates to capture tumor exosomes derived from LNCaP cells, leading to the release of three kinds of messenger DNAs (mDNAs). After magnetic separation, the released mDNAs hybridized with the probe DNAs immobilized on a gold electrode. Electroactive Ru(NH3)(3+)(6) was used as the signal reporter because of its electrostatic attraction to DNA. Subsequent Exo III cyclic digestion caused the electrochemical signal to turn off'. Because the electrochemical signal reflects the concentration of Ru(NH3)(3+)(6) and the concentration of Ru(NH3)(3+)(6) is correlated with the mDNA concentration, which is correlated with the exosome concentration, the tumor exosomes can be detected by examining the decrease in the peak current of Ru(NH3)(3+)(6). In this paper, the signal was amplified by the numerous mDNAs released from the magnetic bead and the Exo III-assisted mDNA recycling. Under the optimal conditions, a detection limit down to 70 partides/mu L was achieved, which is lower than the LODs of most currently available methods. Furthermore, this assay can be used to detect tumor exosomes in complex biological samples, demonstrating potential application in real sample diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据