4.8 Article

Open-Source Potentiostat for Wireless Electrochemical Detection with Smartphones

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 90, 期 10, 页码 6240-6246

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00850

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [51308]
  2. DTRA [HDTRA1-14-C-0037]
  3. Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering
  4. Swedish Research Council (VR)
  5. International Outgoing Marie Curie Fellowship [IOF-GA-2013-622879-ENVIRO]
  6. Summer Research Experience for Undergraduates of the Harvard Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC REU under NSF) [DMR-1420570]
  7. Banco Santander

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes the design and characterization of an open-source universal wireless electrochemical detector (UWED). This detector interfaces with a smartphone (or a tablet) using Bluetooth Low Energy protocol; the smartphone provides (i) a user interface for receiving the experimental parameters from the user and visualizing the result in real time, and (ii) a proxy for storing, processing, and transmitting the data and experimental protocols. This approach simplifies the design, and decreases both the size and the cost of the hardware; it also makes the UWED adaptable to different types of analyses by simple modification of the software. The UWED can perform the most common electroanalytical techniques of potentiometry, chronoamperometry, cyclic voltammetry, and square wave voltammetry, with results closely comparable to benchtop commercial potentiostats. Although the operating ranges of electrical current and voltage of the UWED (+/- 1.5 V, +/- 180 mu A) are more limited than most benchtop commercial potentiostats, its functional range is sufficient for most electrochemical analyses in aqueous solutions. Because the UWED is simple, small in size, assembled from inexpensive components, and completely wireless, it offers new opportunities for the development of affordable diagnostics, sensors, and wearable devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据