4.8 Article

Semiquantitative Nucleic Acid Test with Simultaneous Isotachophoretic Extraction and Amplification

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 90, 期 12, 页码 7221-7229

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00185

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health [R01EB022630]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [TL1TR000422]
  3. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  4. Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need (GAANN) fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) provide high diagnostic accuracy for infectious diseases and quantitative results for monitoring viral infections. The majority of NAATs require complex equipment, cold chain dependent reagents, and skilled technicians to perform the tests. This largely confines NAATs to centralized laboratories and can significantly delay appropriate patient care. Low-cost, point-of-care (POC) NAATs are especially needed in low-resource settings to provide patients with diagnosis and treatment planning in a single visit to improve patient care. In this work, we present a rapid POC NAAT with integrated sample preparation and amplification using electrokinetics and paper substrates. We use simultaneous isotachophoresis (ITP) and recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) to rapidly extract, amplify, and detect target nucleic acids from serum and whole blood in a paper-based format. We demonstrate simultaneous ITP and RPA can consistently detect 5 copies per reaction in buffer and 10 000 copies per milliliter of human serum with no intermediate user steps. We also show preliminary extraction and amplification of DNA from whole blood samples. Our test is rapid (results in less than 20 min) and made from low-cost materials, indicating its potential for detecting infectious diseases and monitoring viral infections at the POC in low resource settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据