4.7 Article

Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography in the separation of glycopeptides and their isomers

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 410, 期 20, 页码 5001-5008

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-1150-3

关键词

Glycoproteomics; Glycopeptides; Hemopexin; Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography; LC-MS/MS

资金

  1. Office Of The Director, National Institutes of Health [S10OD023557]
  2. National Institutes of Health [UO1 CA168926, UO1 CA171146, RO1 CA135069]
  3. CCSG Grant [P30 CA51008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The analysis of intact glycopeptides is a challenge because of the structural variety of the complex conjugates. In this work, we used separation involving hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography using a superficially porous particle HALO (R) penta-HILIC column with tandem mass spectrometric detection for the analysis of N-glycopeptides of hemopexin. We tested the effect of the mobile phase composition on retention and separation of the glycopeptides. The results indicated that the retention of the glycopeptides was the combination of partitioning and adsorption processes. Under the optimized conditions, our HILIC method showed the ability to efficiently separate the glycoforms of the same peptide backbone including separation of the isobaric glycoforms. We achieved efficient separation of core and outer armlinked fucose of bi-antennary and tri-antennary glycoforms of the SWPAVGNCSSALR peptide and bi-antennary glycoform of the ALPQPQNVTSLLGCTH peptide, respectively. Moreover, we demonstrated the separation of antennary position of sialic acid linked via alpha 2-6 linkage of the monosialylated glycopeptides. Glycopeptide isomers are often differentially associated with various biological processes. Therefore, chromatographic separation of the species without the need for an extensive sample preparation appears attractive for their identification, characterization, and reliable quantification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据