4.8 Review

A promising cathode for Li-ion batteries: Li3V2(PO4)3

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 15-58

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2016.02.002

关键词

Received 22 December 2015; Received in revised form; 3 February 2016; Accepted 3 February 2016; Available online 13 February 2016

资金

  1. thousands talents program for the pioneer researcher and his innovation team, China
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CMMI1030048, DMR-1505902]
  3. University of Washington TGIF grant
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1505902] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium ion batteries are essential energy storage devices that power the electronics that let us share information and connect with people anywhere at any time. As the demand for uninterrupted energy performance rises, corresponding challenges need to be overcome in both industry and academia. Currently, cathode performance limits energy-power density in Li-ion batteries. Materials chemists and scientists have devoted much effort to explore cathodes with higher capacities and electrochemical potentials. Lithium vanadium phosphate, a rising star in the cathode family, has attracted more attention in recent years because it can display a high average potential ( >4.0 V) and specific capacity (197 mAh/g) with excellent structural stability during cycling. However, the separated VO6 octahedra intrinsically limit electrical conductivity, which hurts the rate capability. This review focuses on the fundamental issues in lithium vanadium phosphate and summarizes its crystal structure, ion diffusion, and electrochemical characteristics. Three synthetic aspects are described carefully: doping, composite and designing microstructures. At the same time, some rules are distilled from the report results, which may be referred to in order to tune the electrochemical performance in electrode materials. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据