4.7 Article

Evaporative membrane modulation for comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1000, 期 -, 页码 303-309

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.11.053

关键词

Multidimensional liquid chromatography; Evaporative modulation; Membrane evaporation

资金

  1. ARC Training Centre for Portable Analytical Separation Technologies [IC140100022]
  2. ARC Future Fellowship
  3. ARC post-graduate scholarship in ASTech, University of Tasmania
  4. Australian Research Council [IC140100022] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An evaporative membrane modulator was developed, built and evaluated to avoid loss of performance in the second dimension when coupling two-dimensional liquid chromatography systems. The automated interface reduces the volume after D-1 elution on-line by a pre-determined factor, regardless of the separation gradient. This volume reduction ensures that the injection volume in the D-2 is appropriate for the second column, avoiding the detrimental effects of overloading. In addition, the fraction solvent composition is constant over the length of the separation increasing reproducibility of D-2 separations. The evaporative membrane modulator was demonstrated with a 10-fold reduction, reducing the injection volume from 50 to 5 mu L. A consequence of the EMM device is a reduction in the capacity of the first dimension, which is decreased by a factor of 2.4, but the peak width at half maximumwas reduced by up to 22% in the second dimension. When band broadening is considered, the corrected peak capacity with the modulator was only 10% lower than that without the modulator, but with a gain in peak height of 2 -3, and a decrease in retention time between subsequent peak-slices reduced from 4s to be negligible. This improves peak shape and shows potential to facilitate peak identification and quantification in more complex applications. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据