4.7 Article

Homochiral porous organic cage used as stationary phase for open tubular capillary electrochromatography

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 999, 期 -, 页码 169-175

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.11.021

关键词

Porous organic cages; CC3-R; Chiral separation; Open tubular capillary electrochromatography

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675141, 21705142]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous organic molecular cages, as a new type of porous materials, have in recent years attracted a tremendous amount of attention for their potential applications. However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no attempt to utilize porous organic molecular cages as stationary phases in capillary electrochromatography (CEC). We report herein the use of a homochiral porous organic cage (POC) (CC3-R) as a stationary phase in open tubular capillary electrochromatography (OT-CEC) for the separation of chiral compounds and positional isomers. The column was fabricated using CC3-R as the stationary phase by a static coating method. Separation of furoin, benzoin, and alprenlol were achieved on the CC3-R coated column, with the highest resolution value (R-s = 3.35) for the separation of benzoin. The influences of pH and buffer concentration on separation have been investigated. Besides, the CC3-R column also exhibited good selectivity for the separation of positional isomers, including those of nitrophenols, phenylenediamines, aminophenols, and ionones. The run-to-run (n = 5), day-to-day (n = 5), column-to-column (n = 3), and batch-to-batch (n = 3) relative standard deviations (RSDs) for the analyte migration time were in the range of 0.5-1.5%, 0.2-1.8%, 1.2-2.1% and 1.5-2.8%, respectively. The RSDs for the migration time and enantioselectivity of the analyte were less than 5.9% and 2.2% (inter-day, n = 5) after a week of continuous use. This work also indicates that porous organic molecular materials are promising for enantioseparation in CEC and look set to become more attractive in separation science. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据