4.5 Review

The role of the food matrix and gastrointestinal tract in the assessment of biological properties of ingested engineered nanomaterials (iENMs): State of the science and knowledge gaps

期刊

NANOIMPACT
卷 3-4, 期 -, 页码 47-57

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2016.10.002

关键词

Engineered nanomaterials; Nanotoxicology; Gastrointestinal tract; Food matrix effects; Food nanotechnologyin vitro models

资金

  1. Cooperative State Research, Extension, Education Service, USDA, Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station [MAS00491]
  2. USDA, NRI Grants [2013-03795, 2014-67021]
  3. Harvard-NIEHS Nanosafety Center [1U24ES026946]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many foods contain appreciable levels of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) (diameter <100 nm) that may be either intentionally or unintentionally added. These ENMs vary considerably in their compositions, dimensions, morphologies, physicochemical properties, and biological responses. From a toxicological point of view, it is often convenient to classify ingested ENMs (iENMs) as being either inorganic (such as TiO2, SiO2, Fe2O3, or Ag) or organic (such as lipid, protein, or carbohydrate), since the former tend to be indigestible and the latter are generally digestible. At present there is a relatively poor understanding of how different types of iENMs behave within the human gastrointestinal tract (GIT), and how the food matrix and biopolymers transform their physico-chemical properties and influence their gastrointestinal fate. This lack of knowledge confounds an understanding of their potential harmful effects on human health. The purpose of this article is to review our current understanding of the GIT fate of iENMs, and to highlight gaps where further research is urgently needed in assessing potential risks and toxicological implications of iENMs. In particular, a strong emphasis is given to the development of standardized screening methods that can be used to rapidly and accurately assess the toxicological properties of iENMs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据