4.7 Article

Ratiometric fluorescence sensing of mercuric ion based on dye-doped lanthanide coordination polymer particles

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1014, 期 -, 页码 85-90

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.01.065

关键词

Lanthanide infinite coordination polymer; Coumarin@Ce/Tb-AMP; Hg2+; Ratiometric fluorescent sensor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575130, 21305129]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work focused on the development of a novel ratiometric fluorescence sensor for detection of Hg2+ by using dye-doped lanthanide infinite coordination polymer (Ln-ICP) particles. The dye-doped Ln-ICP used herein was prepared by self-assemble of adenosine monophosphate (AMP) with Ce3+ and Tb3+ (Ce/Tb-AMP) through self-adaptive chemistry, in which the fluorescent dye coumarin was encapsulated during the assembly process as a guest molecule. Under 310 nm irradiation, the obtained coumarin@Ce/Tb-AMP itself emitted characteristic green luminescence of Tb3+, accompanied with a weak fluorescence at 445 nm originated from coumarin encapsulated in the Ce/Tb-AMP networks. The fluorescence emission of coumarin became strong when it was released to the solution. In the presence of Hg2+, the coumarin@Ce/Tb-AMP was destroyed due to the specific coordination interaction between AMP and Hg2+, which leaded to the release of coumarin to the solution meanwhile. Consequently, the fluorescence of Ce/Tb-AMP was quenched, while that of coumarin enhanced. On the basis of this strategy, we developed a novel ratiometric fluorescent sensor for the detection of Hg2+ by measuring the ratio of fluorescent intensity of the coumarin@Ce/Tb-AMP suspension, which showed a wide linear range from 0.08 to 1000 nM and detection limit of 0.03 nM with high selectivity and sensitivity. Furthermore, the constructed ratiometric fluorescent sensor was successfully applied in detecting Hg2+ in drinking water and human blood serum (HBS) with satisfactory results. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据