4.7 Article

Current pulse based ion-selective electrodes for chronopotentiometric determination of calcium in seawater

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1031, 期 -, 页码 67-74

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.06.018

关键词

Chronopotentiometry; Ion-selective electrode; Calcium; Seawater; Current pulse

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575158, 21677172]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [Y728021021]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC1400700]
  4. CAS Youth Innovation Promotion Association [2014190]
  5. Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province [TS20081159]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcium is closely related to the oceanic biosphere and carbonate system. Potentiometry based on a calcium-selective electrode (Ca-ISE) represents a promising tool for detection of calcium ion activities in seawater. This technique, however, generally is limited by the low sensitivity for the inherent Nernstian response (i.e. ca 30 mV/dec). A current pulse based ion-selective electrode with enhanced sensitivity for chronopotentiometric measurements of calcium in seawater is proposed. The Ca2+-selective membrane containing lipophilic salt ETH 500 instead of traditional ion-exchanger is galvanostatically controlled. An applied constant cathodic current pulse can leads to the extraction of the calcium ions into the membrane to produce a chronopotential response, which shows a stable and reproducible super-Nernstian response in a narrow calcium activity range. The super-Nernstian region of the electrode depends on not only the the magnitude and duration of the applied current pulse but also the interfering ions. Under optimal conditions, the proposed Ca-ISE exhibits a super-Nernstian response between the calcium concentrations of 10(-)(2.5)-10(-)(1.5)M with a slope of ca 80 mV/dec. The current pulse based Ca-ISE has been applied to determination of calcium in seawater with satisfactory results. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据