4.3 Review

DNA enzymes as potential therapeutics: towards clinical application of 10-23 DNAzymes

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 689-711

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2015.1025048

关键词

10-23 DNAzyme; antibacterial; anti-cancer drug; antisense; antiviral; clinical trial; deoxyribozyme; gene expression downregulation; oligonucleotide; RNA cleavage

资金

  1. Russian government [14. B25.31.0028]
  2. RFBR [15-03-06331]
  3. Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS
  4. Centre De Researche Saint-Antoine INSERM-UPMC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Ongoing studies on the inhibition of gene expression at the mRNA level have identified several types of specific inhibitors such as antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNA, ribozymes and DNAzymes (Dz). After its discovery in 1997, the 10-23 Dz (which can cleave RNA efficiently and site-specifically, has flexible design, is independent from cell mechanisms, does not require expensive chemical modifications for effective use in vivo) has been employed to downregulate a range of therapeutically important genes. Recently, 10-23 Dzs have taken their first steps into clinical trials. Areas covered: This review focuses predominantly on Dz applications as potential antiviral, antibacterial, anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory agents as well as for the treatment of cardiovascular disease and diseases of CNS, summarizing results of their clinical trials up to the present day. Expert opinion: In comparison with antisense oligonucleotides and small interfering RNAs, Dzs do not usually show off-target effects due to their high specificity and lack of immunogenicity in vivo. As more results of clinical trials carried out so far are gradually becoming available, Dzs may turn out to be safe and well-tolerated therapeutics in humans. Therefore, there is a good chance that we may witness a deoxyribozyme drug reaching the clinic in the near future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据