4.5 Article

Gypsum, bassanite, and anhydrite at Gale crater, Mars

期刊

AMERICAN MINERALOGIST
卷 103, 期 7, 页码 1011-1020

出版社

MINERALOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2138/am-2018-6346

关键词

Gypsum; bassanite anhydrite; X-ray diffraction; Mars; Martian Rocks and Minerals: Perspectives from Rovers; Orbiters; and Meteorites

资金

  1. NASA Mars Science Laboratory Mission for CheMin development and operation
  2. Los Alamos National Laboratory Directed Research and Development
  3. NASA [NNH10A083I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analyses by the CheMin X-ray diffraction instrument on Mars Science Laboratory show that gypsum, bassanite, and anhydrite are common minerals at Gale crater. Warm conditions (similar to 6 to 30 degrees C) within CheMin drive gypsum dehydration to bassanite; measured surface temperatures and modeled temperature depth profiles indicate that near-equatorial warm-season surface heating can also cause gypsum dehydration to bassanite. By accounting for instrumental dehydration effects we are able to quantify the in situ abundances of Ca-sulfate phases in sedimentary rocks and in eolian sands at Gale crater. All three Ca-sulfate minerals occur together in some sedimentary rocks and their abundances and associations vary stratigraphically. Several Ca-sulfate diagenetic events are indicated. Salinity-driven anhydrite precipitation at temperatures below similar to 50 degrees C may be supported by co-occurrence of more soluble salts. An alternative pathway to anhydrite via dehydration might be possible, but if so would likely be limited to warmer near-equatorial dark eolian sands that presently contain only anhydrite. The polyphase Ca-sulfate associations at Gale crater reflect limited opportunities for equilibration, and they presage mixed salt associations anticipated in higher strata that are more sulfate-rich and may mark local or global environmental change. Mineral transformations within CheMin also provide a better understanding of changes that might occur in samples returned from Mars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据