4.4 Article

Impaction of spray droplets on leaves: influence of formulation and leaf character on shatter, bounce and adhesion

期刊

EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS
卷 56, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-015-2012-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council through ARC [LP100200476]
  2. Syngenta
  3. Dow AgroSciences
  4. Crop-lands/NuFarm
  5. Bill Gordon Consulting
  6. Plant Protection Chemistry NZ Ltd
  7. China Bureau of Foreign Experts through foreign experts project of Development of loss reducing techniques for chemicals application of field crop in China [2012Z022]
  8. Australian Research Council [LP100200476] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper combines experimental data with simple mathematical models to investigate the influence of spray formulation type and leaf character (wettability) on shatter, bounce and adhesion of droplets impacting with cotton, rice and wheat leaves. Impaction criteria that allow for different angles of the leaf surface and the droplet impact trajectory are presented; their predictions are based on whether combinations of droplet size and velocity lie above or below bounce and shatter boundaries. In the experimental component, real leaves are used, with all their inherent natural variability. Further, commercial agricultural spray nozzles are employed, resulting in a range of droplet characteristics. Given this natural variability, there is broad agreement between the data and predictions. As predicted, the shatter of droplets was found to increase as droplet size and velocity increased, and the surface became harder to wet. Bouncing of droplets occurred most frequently on hard-to-wet surfaces with high-surface-tension mixtures. On the other hand, a number of small droplets with low impact velocity were observed to bounce when predicted to lie well within the adhering regime. We believe this discrepancy between the predictions and experimental data could be due to air layer effects that were not taken into account in the current bounce equations. Other discrepancies between experiment and theory are thought to be due to the current assumption of a dry impact surface, whereas, in practice, the leaf surfaces became increasingly covered with fluid throughout the spray test runs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据