4.4 Article

Evaluation of glucocorticoid compared with immunoglobulin therapy of severe immune thrombocytopenia during pregnancy: Response rate and complication

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aji.13000

关键词

glucocorticoid; immunoglobulin; maternal and neonatal outcomes; pregnancy with immune thrombocytopenia; response rate

资金

  1. Capital special fund Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ProblemEvaluate the response rate of glucocorticoid (GC) and/or immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy in severe thrombocytopenia of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) pregnant patients and the influence on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Method of studyThis is a prospective observational cohort study. Pregnant ITP patients with platelet count less than 30x10(9)/L and their newborn infants participated in this research. Over a 3-year period, 87 patients were allocated to 4 groups: group 1 (n=18) were treated by oral prednisone, group 2 (n=20) with IVIg, group 3 (n=22) with prednisone/methlyprednisone plus IVIg, and group 4 were non-treatment controls (n=27). Diagnosis and therapy were based on guideline from the 2011 American Society of Hematology criteria, and the initial dose of prednisone was 1mg/kgday. Their newborns were followed up to 1year old. ResultsThe response rate among patients who ever received prednisone therapy was 35.5% (11/31) overall, while the IVIg response rate was 55.9% (19/34). The incidence of pregnancy induced hypertension in GC therapy group was significantly higher than controls (22.2% and 13.6% vs 0%). There was no significant difference in neonatal outcomes in treatment groups in comparison with controls. The rate of Neonatal follow-up within 1year old was 63%, and there is no evidence indicated intrauterine GC exposure influence the growth and development. ConclusionGC therapy of 1mg/kg for ITP patients during pregnancy is less efficiency than non-pregnant population and increases the incidence of hypertensive disorders. The use of lower starting doses of prednisone may be suggested for use in pregnancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据