4.6 Article

A FUNDAMENTAL PLANE FOR LONG GAMMA-RAY BURSTS WITH X-RAY PLATEAUS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 825, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/825/2/L20

关键词

cosmological parameters; gamma-ray burst: general; methods: data analysis; radiation mechanisms: non-thermal

资金

  1. European Union Seventh Framework Program [626267]
  2. Polish National Science Centre [DEC-2012/04/A/ST9/00083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A class of long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) presenting light curves with an extended plateau phase in their X-ray afterglows obeys a correlation between the rest-frame end-time of the plateau, T-a, and its corresponding X-ray luminosity, L-a, (Dainotti et al). In this work we perform an analysis of a total sample of 176 Swift GRBs with known redshifts, exhibiting afterglow plateaus. By adding a third parameter that is the peak luminosity in the prompt emission, L-peak, we discover the existence of a new three-parameter correlation. The scatter of data about this plane becomes smaller when a class-specific GRB sample is defined. This sample of 122 GRBs is selected from the total sample by excluding GRBs with associated supernovae (SNe), X-ray flashes and short GRBs with extended emission. With this sample the three-parameter correlation identifies a GRB fundamental plane. Moreover, we further limit our analysis to GRBs with light curves with good data coverage and almost flat plateaus, 40 GRBs forming our gold sample. The intrinsic scatter, sigma(int) = 0.27 +/- 0.04, for the three-parameter correlation for this last sub-class is more than two times smaller than the value for the L-a - T-a one, making this the tightest three-parameter correlation that involves the afterglow plateau phase. Finally, we also show that a slightly less tight correlation is present between L-peak and a proxy for the total energy emitted during the plateau phase, LaTa, confirming the existence of an energy scaling between the prompt and afterglow phases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据