4.6 Article

Sebum/Meibum Surface Film Interactions and Phase Transitional Differences

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 57, 期 6, 页码 2401-2411

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.16-19117

关键词

FTIR; langmuir trough; meibum; NMR; sebum; squalene; tear film

资金

  1. Kentucky Lion's Eye Foundation
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.
  3. National Institute of Health
  4. Kentucky Biomedical Research Infrastructure Network
  5. [R01 EYO 26180]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. Sebum may contribute to the composition of the tear film lipid layer naturally or as a contaminant artifact from collection. The aims of this study were to determine: if sebum changes the rheology of meibum surface films; if the resonance near 5.2 ppm in the H-1-NMR spectra of sebum is due to squalene (SQ); and if sebum or SQ, a major component of sebum, interacts with human meibum. METHODS. Human meibum was collected from the lid margin with a platinum spatula. Human sebum was collected using lipid absorbent tape. Langmuir trough technology was used to measure the rheology of surface films. Infrared spectroscopy was used to measure lipid conformation and phase transitions. We used H-1-NMR to measure composition and confirm the primary structure of SQ. RESULTS. The NMR resonance near 5.2 ppm in the spectra of human sebum was from SQ which composed 28 mole percent of sebum. Both sebum and SQ lowered the lipid order of meibum. Sebum expanded meibum films at lower concentrations and condensed meibum films at higher concentrations. Sebum caused meibum to be more stable at higher pressures (greater maximum surface pressure). CONCLUSIONS. Physiological levels of sebum would be expected to expand or fluidize meibum making it spread better and be more surface active (qualities beneficial for tear film stability). Sebum would also be expected to stabilize the tear film lipid layer, which may allow it to withstand the high shear pressure of a blink.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据