4.6 Article

Isoform-specific role of Na/K-ATPase α1 in skeletal muscle

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00275.2017

关键词

extensor digitorum longus; isoform; mouse; muscle; ouabain; soleus

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL-109015, RO1-AR-063710]
  2. Marshall Institute for Interdisciplinary Research funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The distribution of Na/K-ATPase alpha-isoforms in skeletal muscle is unique, with alpha 1 as the minor (15%) isoform and alpha 2 comprising the bulk of the Na/K-ATPase pool. The acute and isoform-specific role of alpha 2 in muscle performance and resistance to fatigue is well known, but the isoform-specific role of alpha 1 has not been as thoroughly investigated. In vitro, we reported that alpha 1 has a role in promoting cell growth that is not supported by alpha 2. To assess whether alpha 1 serves this isoform-specific trophic role in the skeletal muscle, we used Na/K-ATPase alpha 1-haploinsufficient (alpha 1(+/-)) mice. A 30% decrease of Na/K-ATPase alpha 1 protein expression without change in alpha 2 induced a modest yet significant decrease of 10% weight in the oxidative soleus muscle. In contrast, the mixed plantaris and glycolytic extensor digitorum longus weights were not significantly affected, likely because of their very low expression level of alpha 1 compared with the soleus. The soleus mass reduction occurred without change in total Na/K-ATPase activity or glycogen metabolism. Serum analytes including K+, fat tissue mass, and exercise capacity were not altered in alpha 1(+/-) mice. The impact of alpha 1 content on soleus muscle mass is consistent with a Na/K-ATPase alpha 1-specific role in skeletal muscle growth that cannot be fulfilled by alpha 2. The preserved running capacity in alpha 1(+/-) is in sharp contrast with previously reported consequences of genetic manipulation of alpha 2. Taken together, these results lend further support to the concept of distinct isoform-specific functions of Na/K-ATPase alpha 1 and alpha 2 in skeletal muscle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据