4.6 Article

Measurement and Associations of the Optic Nerve Subarachnoid Space in Normal Tension and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 128-137

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.11.024

关键词

-

资金

  1. PRIMING SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE JUNIOR researcher in Beijing Tongren Hospital
  2. Capital Medical University [2016-YJJ-ZZL-021]
  3. National Natural Science Fund Projects of China [81271005, 81300767]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To measure the area of the optic nerve subarachnoid space (ONSASA) in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG), primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and controls and examine its association with relevant ocular and systemic parameters. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study included 40 patients with NTG, 42 with POAG, and 45 healthy controls. B-scan ultrasound was performed binocularly, using a 12.5-MHz linear array probe. The measurement of the optic nerve subarachnoid space (ONSAS) and calculation of the ONSASA using ImageJ 1.51e analysis software was done by 2 experienced observers in a masked manner. RESULTS: The ONSASA between 3 and 7 mm behind the globe in NTG (5.15 +/- 0.81 mm(2)) was significantly smaller than that in the POAG (6.24 +/- 1.62 mm(2), P = .0008) or control (6.40 +/- 2.20 mm(2); P = .0007) groups. ONSASA in the POAG and control groups were not significantly different (P = .13). ONSASA was significantly associated with mean lOP (P = .0004) and highest IOP (P = .0007). The optic nerve sheath diameter in NTG compared to POAG was significantly different at 3 mm (4.46 +/- 0.43 mm vs 4.79 +/- 0.40 mm, P = .0007), 5 mm (4.40 +/- 0.39 mm vs 4.65 +/- 0.47 mm, P = .003), and 7 mm (4.36 +/- 0.35 mm vs 4.61 +/- 0.30 mm, P = .004) behind the globe. CONCLUSIONS: The ONSASA is smaller in NTG as compared to normal control. This is compatible with a lower cerebrospinal fluid pressure in the optic nerve in NTG, implying that trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference might be abnormally higher in the NTG group than in normal controls. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据