4.7 Article

Analysis of the 4-year IceCube high-energy starting events

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 94, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.023009

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ramon y Cajal contract
  2. Spanish MINECO [FPA2014-54459-P, SEV-2014-0398]
  3. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEOII/2014/049]
  4. Spanish of the MINECO [FPA2014-57816-P]
  5. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [674895, 674896]
  6. Portuguese FCT through the CFTP-FCT Unit 777 [PEst-OE/FIS/UI0777/2013]
  7. [PROMETEOII/2014/050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After four years of data taking, the IceCube neutrino telescope has detected 54 high-energy starting events (HESE, or contained-vertex events) with deposited energies above 20 TeV. They represent the first detection of high-energy extraterrestrial neutrinos and, therefore, the first step in neutrino astronomy. To study the energy, flavor, and isotropy of the astrophysical neutrino flux arriving at Earth, we perform different analyses of two different deposited energy intervals, [10 TeV-10 PeV] and [60 TeV-10 PeV]. We first consider an isotropic unbroken power-law spectrum and constrain its shape, normalization, and flavor composition. Our results are in agreement with the preliminary IceCube results, although we obtain a slightly softer spectrum. We also find that current data are not sensitive to a possible neutrino-antineutrino asymmetry in the astrophysical flux. Then, we show that although a two-component power-law model leads to a slightly better fit, it does not represent a significant improvement with respect to a single power-law flux. Finally, we analyze the possible existence of a north-south asymmetry, hinted at by the combination of the HESE sample with the throughgoing muon data. If we use only HESE data, the scarce statistics from the Northern Hemisphere does not allow us to reach any conclusive answer, which indicates that the HESE sample alone is not driving the potential north-south asymmetry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据