4.5 Article

Patient- and hospital-level predictors of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bacteremia in Ontario, Canada

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL
卷 46, 期 11, 页码 1266-1271

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.05.003

关键词

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus; VRE; Bacieremia; Risk factors

资金

  1. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)
  2. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Data are limited on risk factors for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcris (VRE) bacteremia. Methods: All patients with a confirmed VRE bacteremia in Ontario, Canada, between January 2009 and December 2013 were linked to provincial healthcare administrative data sources and frequency matched to 3 controls based on age, sex, and aggregated diagnosis group. Associations between predictors and VRE bacteremia were estimated by generalized estimating equations and summarized using odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: In total, 217 cases and 651 controls were examined. In adjusted analyses, patient-level predictors included bone marrow transplant (OR 106.99 [95% CI 12.19-939.26]): solid organ transplant (OR 17.17 [95% CI 4.95-59.54]): any cancer (OR 8.64 [95% CI 3.88-19.211): intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR 6.81 [95% CI 3.53-13.13]): heart disease (OR 5.27 [95% CI 2.00-13.90]): and longer length of stay (OR 1.07 per day [95% CI 1.06-1.09]). Hospital-level predictors included hospital size (per increase in 100 beds (OR 1.26 [95% CI 1.07-1.48]) and teaching hospitals (OR 3.87 [95% CI 1.85-8.08]). Conclusions: Patients with a bone marrow transplant, solid organ transplant, cancer, or who are admitted to the ICU are at highest risk of VRE bacteremia, particularly at large hospitals and teaching hospitals. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据