4.1 Review

Alectinib for advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY
卷 75, 期 8, 页码 515-522

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.2146/ajhp170266

关键词

alectinib; antineoplastic agents; carcinoma; non-small-cell lung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability, dosage and administration, and place in therapy of alectinib for treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are reviewed. Summary. In patients with NSCLC driven by mutations of ALK, the gene coding for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), treatment with the ALK inhibitor crizotinib has been found to provide median progression-free survival (PFS) of 10.9 months; however, therapeutic failures and tumor progression to brain metastases are common with crizotinib use, prompting research to find more potent and tolerable ALK inhibitors that target major oncogenic drivers of NSCLC. Alectinib is a next-generation ALK inhibitor initially approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in patients with metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC who are intolerant of or have disease progression during crizotinib therapy. In clinical trials, alectinib was found effective for delaying disease progression and, more importantly, reducing brain metastases in patients with NSCLC who developed resistance or intolerance to previous crizotinib therapy. Published data from clinical trials indicate that the most common grade 1 and 2 adverse effects associated with alectinib use are fatigue, constipation, peripheral edema, and myalgia; the most common grade 3 or 4 reactions include increases in creatine phosphokinase, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase levels. Conclusion. Alectinib appears to be effective and safe for use in patients with metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC, with demonstrated superiority over crizotinib in terms of PFS rates. Research to better define ALK inhibitor resistance mechanisms and alectinib's place in therapy is ongoing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据