Radiologic discrepancies in children with special healthcare needs in a pediatric emergency department

Background: After-hours radiologic interpretation by nonradiology attendings or resident radiologists introduces the risk of discrepancies. Clinical outcomes following radiologic discrepancies among pediatric emergency department (ED) patients are poorly described. In particular, children with special healthcare needs (CSHCN), have more opportunities for discrepancies and potential consequences than non- CSHCN. Our objective was to determine the rates and types of radiologic discrepancies, and to compare CSHCN to non-CSHCN. Methods: From July 2014 to February 2015, all children who underwent a diagnostic imaging study at a freestanding children's ED were included. Data collected included radiologic studies - type and location - and clinical details - chief complaint and CSHCN type. Differences between preliminary reads and final pediatric radiology attending reads were defined as discrepancies, and categorized by clinical significance. Descriptive statistics, z-tests, and chi-square were used. Results: Over 8 months, 8310 visits (7462 unique patients) had radiologic studies (2620 CSHCN, 5690 nonCSHCN). A total of 198 (2.4%) radiologic discrepancies [56 (28.3%) CSHCN, 142 (71.7%) non-CSHCN] were found. Chief complaints for CSCHN were more often within the cardiac, pulmonary and neurologic systems (p < 0.001 for each), whereas non-CSHCN presented with more trauma (p < 0.001). The rates of discrepancies (CSHCN 2.1%, non- CSHCN 2.5%, p = 0.3) and severity of clinical consequences (p = 0.6) were not significantly different between CSHCN and non-CSHCN. Conclusion: Though the frequency and type of radiologic studies performed between CSHCN and non-CSHCN were different, we found no significant difference in the rate of radiologic discrepancies or the rate of clinically significant radiologic discrepancies. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.