4.2 Article

What cognitive sciences have to say about the impacts of nutritional labelling formats

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 17-29

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2016.01.005

关键词

Food labelling; Food choice; Behavioural economics; Cognitive science; Traffic lights; Guideline daily amount

资金

  1. INRA Metaprogramme DiD'IT
  2. Metaprogramme DID'IT
  3. EU through the award of an AgreenSkills/AgreenSkills+ fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Social sciences have been exploring how different labelling systems affect people's food choices, whereas cognitive psychology has largely ignored that question. We propose a normalization of the criteria that discriminate labels between them, which we use as a framework to review the cognitive processes involved when using these labelling systems. We insist on the heated debate between Traffic Light and Guideline Daily Amount labels, but did also address other labelling schemes like the Keyhole system. We conclude on which labels are cognitively the less effortful and the quickest to process. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据