4.5 Article

Developmental pathways linking childhood and adolescent internalizing, externalizing, academic competence, and adolescent depression

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 30-40

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.05.009

关键词

Depression; Longitudinal; Cascades; Internalizing; Externalizing; Academic competence

资金

  1. SickKids Foundation [SKF 116328]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [SKF 116328]
  3. Canada Research Chairs program
  4. ESRC [ES/M001660/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/M001660/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined longitudinal pathways through three domains of adaptation from ages 4-5 to 14-15 (internalizing problems, externalizing problems, and academic competence) towards depressive symptoms at age 16-17. Participants were 6425 Canadian children followed bi-annually as part of the National Longitudinal Study of Children and Youth. Within-domain (i.e., stability) effects were moderate in strength. We found longitudinal cross-domain effects across one time point (i.e., one-lag cascades) between internalizing and externalizing in early childhood (positive associations), and between academic competence and externalizing in later childhood and adolescence (negative associations). We also found cascade effects over multiple time points (i.e., multi-lag cascades); lower academic competence at age 4-5 and greater internalizing at age 6-7 predicted greater age 12-13 externalizing, and greater age 6-7 externalizing predicted greater age 16-17 depression. Important pathways towards adolescent depression include a stability path through childhood and adolescent internalizing, as well as a number of potential paths involving all domains of adaptation, highlighting the multifactorial nature of adolescent depression. (C) 2016 The Foundation for Professionals in Services for Adolescents. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据