4.2 Article

Antimalarial drug artemisinin depletes erythrocytes by activating apoptotic pathways in zebrafish

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 331-341

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2014.11.012

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB529503, 2012CB944501]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31430059, 31271549, 31221002, 81270164]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite its extraordinary efficacy, administration of the major antimalarial drug artemisinin leads to anemia, and the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms are not well understood. Here, we report the effects of artemisinin on erythroid development and apoptosis in zebrafish and human cells. By performing a small-molecule screen with zebrafish embryos, we found that artemisinin treatment depleted red blood cells and slightly decreased definitive hematopoietic stem cells, but had no effect on primitive hematopoietic progenitors. RNA-Seq revealed that artemisinin suppressed a cluster of genes in the heme biosynthesis and globin synthesis pathways. Furthermore, artemisinin induced apoptosis in erythrocytes in zebrafish embryos, as assessed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling assay, and preferentially acted on differentiated erythrocytes by elevating caspase 8 and caspase 9 activity in differentiated human K562 cells. Consistently, artemisinin suppressed the ectopic expression of erythroid genes in jak2aV581F-injected embryos, a zebrafish model for human polycythemia vera in which the bone marrow makes too many red blood cells. Taken together, our data suggested that artemisinin, in addition to killing parasites, has a direct action on differentiated erythrocytes other than definitive hematopoietic stem cells and causes erythroid apoptosis by interfering with the heme biosynthesis pathway in zebrafish and human cells. Copyright (C) 2015 ISEH - International Society for Experimental Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据