4.7 Article

Changing the balance of the MTO reaction dual-cycle mechanism: Reactions over ZSM-5 with varying contact times

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 37, 期 8, 页码 1413-1422

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62466-X

关键词

Methanol to olefins; Dual-cycle mechanism; ZSM-5; Contact time; Hydrogen transfer reaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91545104, 21576256, 21473182, 21273230, 21273005]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The methanol to olefins (MTO) reaction was performed over ZSM-5 zeolite at 300 degrees C under various methanol weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) values. During these trials, the catalytic perfor mance was assessed, in addition to the formation and function of organic compounds retained in the zeolite. Analysis of reaction effluents and confined organics demonstrated a dual-cycle reaction mechanism when employing ZSM-5. The extent of the hydrogen transfer reaction, a secondary reaction in the MTO process, varied as the catalyst-methanol contact time was changed. In addition, C-12/C-13-methanol switch experiments indicated a relationship between the dual-cycle mechanism and the extent of the hydrogen transfer reaction. Reactions employing a low methanol WHSV in conjunction with a long contact time favored the hydrogen transfer reaction to give alkene products and promoted the generation and accumulation of retained organic species, such as aromatics and methylcyclopentadienes, which enhance the aromatic cycle. When using higher WHSV values, the reduced contact times lessened the extent of the hydrogen transfer reaction and limited the generation of methylcyclopentadienes and aromatic species. This suppressed the aromatic cycle, such that the alkene cycle became the dominant route during the MTO reaction. (C) 2016, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据