4.4 Article

Relation of Left Atrial Appendage Remodeling by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Outcome of Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 122, 期 1, 页码 83-88

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.027

关键词

-

资金

  1. estech
  2. Sanofi
  3. Biotronik
  4. eCardio
  5. Boston Scientific
  6. St Jude Medical

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a nonpulmonary vein trigger site in atrial fibrillation (AF). The association of LAA structural remodeling (SRM) identified by late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) and AF ablation outcome has never been described. This study sought to investigate the clinical significance of LAA-SRM in AF patients who undergo ablation therapy. Consecutive patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation therapy within 14 days following MRI scan were included in this study. LAA-SRM was assessed using LGE-MRI images to quantify the extent of LAA-LGE. Patients were followed for arrhythmia recurrence after the ablation procedure. A total of 74 patients were included in the study, 68% were male, with a mean age of 72 years. Mean LAA-LGE extent was 9%. There were 37 arrhythmia recurrences (50%) observed over a mean follow-up period of 18 months. The recurrence rate was significantly higher (73.3% vs 37.5%; p = 0.045) in patients with LAA-LGE extent in the highest tier (T4) compared with the lowest tier (Tl). LAA-LGE extent was independently associated with arrhythmia recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.054; 95% confidence interval [Cl] 1.008 to 1.103). In addition, there was an approximately fourfold increased risk of arrhythmia recurrence (adjusted HR 4.117, 95% Cl 1.260 to 13.459) in patients with advanced LAA-SRM (T4 vs Tl). In conclusion, the extent of LAA-SRM identified by LGE-MRI is associated with arrhythmia recurrence after AF ablation. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2018;122:83-88)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据