4.4 Article

Stroke and Cardiovascular Events After Ablation or Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 121, 期 10, 页码 1192-1199

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.01.043

关键词

-

资金

  1. Abbott

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are the most common rhythm-control strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF). Data comparing the rate of stroke and cardiovascular events between the treatment strategies are limited. Therefore, this observational study uses claims data to compare rate of cardiovascular hospitalization and stroke for patients with AF treated with ablation or AADs. Patients in the MarketScan dataset with AF between January 2010 and December 2014 were categorized in the ablation group if an atrial catheter ablation was performed, or in the AAD group if a relevant AAD was prescribed for AF but no ablation was performed. One year of history was required, and the index event was selected as the most recent ablation or AAD prescription closest to January 1, 2013. A 2:1 propensity score match was performed for age, gender, comorbidities, and total medical cost in the year before index event. Outcomes included thromboembolic event (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism) and all cardiovascular hospitalizations. Of the 164,639 patients in the AAD group, 29,456 were matched to the 14,728 ablation patients. There were no significant differences in age (64 +/- 10 in both groups), gender (58% male), or CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score (3.2 +/- 1.3). Risk of hospitalization with primary diagnosis of thromboembolic event was 41% greater in the AADs group (p < 0.001), and cardiovascular hospitalizations were 13% more likely (p < 0.001). In conclusion, patients treated with catheter ablation of AF have lower risk of thromboembolic events and cardiovascular hospitalizations than a matched cohort of patients managed with AADs. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据