4.7 Article

Household livelihood change under the rocky desertification control project in karst areas, Southwest China

期刊

LAND USE POLICY
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 8-15

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.009

关键词

The rocky desertification control project; Household livelihoods; Karst areas; China

资金

  1. National Social Science Foundation [13CJY067]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371045, 41261038]
  3. Major Applied Basic Programs of Guizhou Province [JZ-2014-200206]
  4. Program B for Outstanding PhD candidate of Nanjing University [2015018026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Rocky Desertification Control Project (RDCP) has become an important government measure to prevent soil erosion, restore vegetation, and pull farmers out of poverty in the karst areas of Southwest China. In order to understand the impact of the RDCP on households' livelihoods, we surveyed 150 households and collected a total of 117 valid questionnaires in 2013 to analyze the impact of the RDCP on their livelihoods and their livelihood response of the project. The results showed that RDCP significantly improved the process of household livelihood diversity and non-agriculturalization, and a distinct non-agricultural transfer of the rural labor force appeared after the RDCP implementation, characterized mainly by off farm employment. But RDCP has no direct or significant impact on the increase of households' income which is primarily due to off-farm employment income. Although farmers emphasized on earning profits in the short run when they choose alternative livelihoods in the future, their choices are significantly impacted by the individual conditions. Furthermore, 38.5% of the households considered returning to agricultural production. Besides, households' concern on ecological environment is positively related with their dependence on environmental resources. To prevent a return to agriculture, it is important to develop compensation policies, to create new jobs, and to provide job training to help households construct new alternatives to returning to old livelihoods. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据