4.6 Article

Managing flood risks in the Mekong Delta: How to address emerging challenges under climate change and socioeconomic developments

期刊

AMBIO
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 635-649

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-017-1009-4

关键词

Challenges; Climate change; Flood-risk management; Mekong Delta; Socioeconomic developments; Solutions

资金

  1. Academy of Finland project SCART [267463]
  2. Emil Aaltonen foundation (eat-lesswater'' project)
  3. Veni-grant of NWO Earth and Life Sciences (ALW) [863.14.008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change and accelerating socioeconomic developments increasingly challenge flood-risk management in the Vietnamese Mekong River Deltaa typical large, economically dynamic and highly vulnerable delta. This study identifies and addresses the emerging challenges for flood-risk management. Furthermore, we identify and analyse response solutions, focusing on meaningful configurations of the individual solutions and how they can be tailored to specific challenges using expert surveys, content analysis techniques and statistical inferences. Our findings show that the challenges for flood-risk management are diverse, but critical challenges predominantly arise from the current governance and institutional settings. The top-three challenges include weak collaboration, conflicting management objectives and low responsiveness to new issues. We identified 114 reported solutions and developed six flood management strategies that are tailored to specific challenges. We conclude that the current technology-centric flood management approach is insufficient given the rapid socioecological changes. This approach therefore should be adapted towards a more balanced management configuration where technical and infrastructural measures are combined with institutional and governance resolutions. Insights from this study contribute to the emerging repertoire of contemporary flood management solutions,especially through their configurations and tailoring to specific challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据