4.7 Article

Apolipoprotein E4 inhibits autophagy gene products through direct, specific binding to CLEAR motifs

期刊

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 230-242

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.07.754

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; APOE genotype; ApoE protein; autophagy; DNA binding; TFEB; Transcription; Protein aggregation; Molecular-dynamic simulation; EMSA; PLA

资金

  1. NIA [AG12411]
  2. US Dept. of Veterans Affairs Merit Award [2 I01 BX001655-05]
  3. US National Science Foundation [CRI CNS-0855248, EPS 0701890, EPS-0918970, MRI CNS-0619069]
  4. Windgate Foundation
  5. Philip R. Jonsson Foundation
  6. Ottenheimer Brothers Foundation
  7. STOP Alzheimer's campaign at the UAMS Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Alzheimer apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon 4/epsilon 4 carriers have earlier disease onset and more protein aggregates than patients with other APOE genotypes. Autophagy opposes aggregation, and important autophagy genes are coordinately regulated by transcription factor EB (TFEB) binding to coordinated lysosomal expression and regulation (CLEAR) DNA motifs. Methods: Autophagic gene expression was assessed in brains of controls and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients parsed by APOE genotype and in a glioblastoma cell line expressing either apoE3 or apoE4. Computational modeling assessed interactions between apoE and mutated apoE with CLEAR or modified DNA. Results: Three TFEB-regulated mRNA transcripts-SQSTM, MAP1LC3B, and LAMP2-were lower inAD epsilon 4/epsilon 4 than inAD epsilon 3/epsilon 3 brains. Computationalmodeling predicted avid specific binding of apoE4 to CLEAR motifs. ApoE was found in cellular nuclei, and in vitro binding assays suggest competition between apoE4 and TFEB at CLEAR sites. Conclusion: ApoE4-CLEAR interactions may account for suppressed autophagy in APOE epsilon 4/epsilon 4 carriers and, in this way, contribute to earlier AD onset. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Alzheimer's Association.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据