4.7 Article

The cost of Alzheimer's disease in China and re-estimation of costs worldwide

期刊

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 483-491

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.12.006

关键词

Alzheimer's; Dementia; Cost of illness; Observational study

资金

  1. CHINA-CANADA Joint Initiative on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders [81261120571]
  2. Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81530036]
  3. National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Project [31627803]
  4. Key Medical Professional Development Plan of Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals [ZY201301]
  5. Mission Program of Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals [SML20150801]
  6. Beijing Scholars Program, Beijing Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning [PXM2017_026283_000002]
  7. Beijing Brain Initiative from Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission [Z161100000216137]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The socioeconomic costs of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in China and its impact on global economic burden remain uncertain. Methods: We collected data from 3098 patients with AD in 81 representative centers across China and estimated AD costs for individual patient and total patients in China in 2015. Based on this data, we re-estimated the worldwide costs of AD. Results: The annual socioeconomic cost per patient was US $19,144.36, and total costs were US $167.74 billion in 2015. The annual total costs are predicted to reach US $507.49 billion in 2030 and US $1.89 trillion in 2050. Based on our results, the global estimates of costs for dementia were US $957.56 billion in 2015, and will be US $2.54 trillion in 2030, and US $9.12 trillion in 2050, much more than the predictions by the World Alzheimer Report 2015. Discussion: China bears a heavy burden of AD costs, which greatly change the estimates of AD cost worldwide. (C) 2017 the Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据