4.1 Article

Relationships Between Cognitive Complaints and Quality of Life in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment, Mild Alzheimer Disease Dementia, and Normal Cognition

期刊

ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 276-283

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000262

关键词

self-rated health; Alzheimer disease; self-reported symptoms; mild cognitive impairment; quality of life

资金

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Healthy Brain Research Center [U48-DP-005053]
  2. Diane Eisen Memorial Neurodegenerative Disease Research Fund
  3. Alzheimer's Association [AARF-17-528934]
  4. Marian S. Ware Alzheimer Program
  5. National Institute of Aging [P30-AG-010124]
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P30AG010124] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To examine in persons with varying degrees of cognitive impairment the relationship between self-reports of cognitive complaints and quality of life (QOL). Methods: Older adults (n=259) with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and mild stage Alzheimer disease (AD) dementia completed tests of cognition and self-report questionnaires about QOL and 3 kinds of cognitive complaints: cognitive difficulties, distress from cognitive difficulties, and believing you had more memory problems than most people. Bivariate, multivariable, and multivariate regression analyses assessed relationships between domains of QOL and each cognitive complaint. Results: Bivariate and multivariable analyses controlling for severity of cognitive and functional impairment found that cognitive complaints were related to relatively lower quality of daily life (QOL-AD, Dementia Quality of Life Scale), greater depression (GDS), more anxiety (BAI), higher perceived stress (PSS), and lower general mental well-being (SF-12 MCS). Discussion: Cognitive complaints have robust associations with QOL. These findings have implications for AD prevention trials and management of clinical populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据