4.1 Article

Meta-analysis of prevalence of wheezing and recurrent wheezing in infants

期刊

ALLERGOLOGIA ET IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 210-217

出版社

CODON PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2016.08.011

关键词

Epidemiology; Infants; Meta-analysis; Prevalence; Recurrent wheezing; Wheezing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Wheezing affects children's quality of life, and is related with asthma in childhood. Although prevalence of wheezing has been previously studied in several countries, there is no reference of worldwide prevalence in infants. The aim of this meta-analysis is to estimate the prevalence of wheezing and recurrent wheezing in infants aged up to two years, and compare the prevalence across world regions. Methods: Literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases, looking for observational studies published up to June 2016, including as keywords prevalence or epidemiology combined with wheeze, wheezing or asthma symptoms and infant or preschool. Fast*Pro software and random effects Bayesian model were used. Heterogeneity was estimated using 12 statistic, and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: We identified 109 studies after duplicates were removed. After exclusions, 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Prevalence of wheezing and recurrent wheezing were 36.06% (95% CI 35.17-36.96), and 17.41% (95% CI 16.74-18.09), respectively. In European countries, prevalence of wheezing was 30.68% (95% CI 28.97-32.45), and 12.35% (95% CI 11.27-13.47) for recurrent wheezing. Prevalence of wheezing and recurrent wheezing in Latin America were higher, 40.55% (95% CI 39.40-41.71), and 19.27% (95% CI 18.44-20.11), respectively. In Africa, prevalence of wheezing was 15.97% (95% CI 14.05-18.00). Low or no heterogeneity was found in all cases. Conclusions: More than one third of infants suffer from wheezing and almost one fifth from recurrent wheezing, being these illnesses especially prevalent in Latin American countries, pointing out an important public health problem. (C) 2016 SEICAP. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据