4.4 Article

A Comparison of Self-Report and Audiometric Measures of Hearing and Their Associations With Functional Outcomes in Older Adults

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 890-910

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0898264315614006

关键词

hearing impairment; older adults; self-reported hearing; audiometry; physical function

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [K23DC011279]
  2. Eleanor Schwartz Charitable Foundation
  3. Triological Society/American College of Surgeons Clinician Scientist Award
  4. Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR)
  5. NIH from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) [TL1 TR001078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The aim was to investigate whether associations of hearing impairment (HI) with functional outcomes in older adults differ when using self-report versus pure-tone audiometry. Method: We examined 1,669 participants 70 years in National Health and Examination Survey from 2005-2006 and 2009-2010 whose hearing was assessed by self-report and pure-tone audiometry. We explored functional outcomes associated with audiometric HI (low physical activity, poor physical functioning, and hospitalization). Results: In adjusted models, we found significant associations of audiometric HI with both subjective and objective outcomes (e.g., dichotomous HI with self-reported difficulty in activities of daily living [ADLs], odds ratio [OR] = 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.05, 2.06], and low accelerometer-measured physical activity, OR = 2.19, 95% CI [1.11, 4.34]). In contrast, self-reported HI was only associated with subjective outcomes and not with objective outcomes (e.g., dichotomous HI with difficulty in ADLs, OR = 1.63, 95% CI [1.12, 2.38], and low accelerometer-measured physical activity, OR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.66, 1.35]). Discussion: Results using self-reported hearing should not be considered representative of results using audiometry and may provide distinct aspects of HI in older adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据