4.4 Article

Seroconversion on preexposure prophylaxis: a case report with segmental hair analysis for timed adherence determination

期刊

AIDS
卷 32, 期 9, 页码 F1-F4

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001825

关键词

hair analysis; preexposure prophylaxis; seroconversion

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health [NIAID/NIH 2RO1 AI098472]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We describe the third case report of seroconversion with multidrug resistant (MDR)-HIV despite pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with emtricitabine (FTC) and tenofovir (TFV) disoproxil (TDF). Design: Case report. Methods: PrEP adherence was assessed via self-report, pharmacy records, and measuring TFV/FTC levels with liquid-chromatography/tandem-mass-spectrometry in plasma and hair. Segmental hair analysis was performed to assess PrEP adherence over prior months. Genotypic resistance was assessed. Results: A 34 year-old white MSM started daily FTC/TDF in February 2016 after being provided 11 refills. In March 2017, he developed fevers, chills, myalgias and was assessed, but no HIV test was sent. In April 2017, an antigen/antibody HIV test was reactive (day 0). On day 2, HIV-1 RNA was 27 316 copies/ml, genotyping revealed M184V, K70T, K65R, and K103N mutations, plasma TFV and FTC concentrations were consistent with recent dosing. To evaluate adherence over preceding months, a hair sample was collected at day 27 and segmental analysis of TFV/FTC levels performed in one-centimeter segments from the scalp. Hair drug levels (0.0434-0.0520 ng TFV/mg hair) were commensurate with consistently high PrEP adherence over the prior 3 months. Conclusions: This studyemploys segmental analysis of PrEP drug levels in hair for the first time to assess adherence over preceding months in the setting of an HIV seroconversion on PrEP. High adherence over the period of likely acquisition makesMDR-HIV infection the most likely scenario in this case. Adequate adherence assessment when examining PrEP failures and ensuring best practices in PrEP prescribing and follow-up are important. Copyright (C) 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据