4.3 Review

Human Subjects Protection and Technology in Prevention Science: Selected Opportunities and Challenges

期刊

PREVENTION SCIENCE
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 765-778

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11121-016-0664-1

关键词

Human subjects; Prevention; Technology; Ethics; Common rule regulations; IRB

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [K23MH101449, R01MH091452, R01MH040859, P20MH090318, R01MH095753, R01MH100482]
  2. Centers for Disease Control [R49CE002093]
  3. National Institute on Drug Abuse [P30DA027828]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Internet-connected devices are changing the way people live, work, and relate to one another. For prevention scientists, technological advances create opportunities to promote the welfare of human subjects and society. The challenge is to obtain the benefits while minimizing risks. In this article, we use the guiding principles for ethical human subjects research and proposed changes to the Common Rule regulations, as a basis for discussing selected opportunities and challenges that new technologies present for prevention science. The benefits of conducting research with new populations, and at new levels of integration into participants' daily lives, are presented along with five challenges along with technological and other solutions to strengthen the protections that we provide: (1) achieving adequate informed consent with procedures that are acceptable to participants in a digital age; (2) balancing opportunities for rapid development and broad reach, with gaining adequate understanding of population needs; (3) integrating data collection and intervention into participants' lives while minimizing intrusiveness and fatigue; (4) setting appropriate expectations for responding to safety and suicide concerns; and (5) safeguarding newly available streams of sensitive data. Our goal is to promote collaboration between prevention scientists, institutional review boards, and community members to safely and ethically harness advancing technologies to strengthen impact of prevention science.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据