4.7 Article

BAHAMAS: NEW ANALYSIS OF TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE REVEALS INCONSISTENCIES WITH STANDARD COSMOLOGY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 827, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/1

关键词

cosmological parameters; dark energy; dark matter; distance scale; methods: statistical

资金

  1. EPSRC
  2. British Royal Society [WM110023]
  3. European Commission [FP7-PEOPLE-2012-CIG-321865, H2020-MSCA-RISE-2015-691164]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K503733/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K001051/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Royal Society [WM110023] Funding Source: Royal Society
  7. STFC [ST/K001051/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present results obtained by applying our BAyesian HierArchical Modeling for the Analysis of Supernova cosmology (BAHAMAS) software package to the 740 spectroscopically confirmed supernovae of type Ia (SNe Ia) from the Joint Light-curve Analysis (JLA) data set. We simultaneously determine cosmological parameters and standardization parameters, including corrections for host galaxy mass, residual scatter, and object-by-object intrinsic magnitudes. Combining JLA and Planck data on the cosmic microwave background, we find significant discrepancies in cosmological parameter constraints with respect to the standard analysis: we find Omega(m) = 0.399 +/- 0.027, 2.8 sigma higher than previously reported, and w = -0.910 +/- 0.045, 1.6 sigma higher than the standard analysis. We determine the residual scatter to be sigma(res) = 0.104 +/- 0.005. We confirm (at the 95% probability level) the existence of two subpopulations segregated by host galaxy mass, separated at log(10)(M/M-circle dot)= 10, differing in mean intrinsic magnitude by 0.055 +/- 0.022 mag, lower than previously reported. Cosmological parameter constraints, however, are unaffected by the inclusion of corrections for host galaxy mass. We find similar to 4 sigma evidence for a sharp drop in the value of the color correction parameter, beta(z), at a redshift z(t) = 0.662 +/- 0.055 We rule out some possible explanations for this behavior, which remains unexplained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据