4.7 Article

Agroecosystem tradeoffs associated with conversion to subsurface drip irrigation in organic systems

期刊

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
卷 202, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.02.005

关键词

Aggregation; Carbon sequestration; Irrigation; Nutrient cycling; Organic agriculture; Irrigation water productivity

资金

  1. Agricultural Sustainability Institute
  2. National Science Foundation GRFP [1650042]
  3. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Agricultural Experiment Station Hatch Projects [CA-D-PLS-2332-352H, CA-2122-H]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subsurface drip (SSD) irrigation is becoming increasingly prevalent in drought-prone irrigated agroecosystems thanks to greater yields and irrigation water productivity (IWP) and decreased weed pressure. However, potential tradeoffs for soil health and biogeochemical cycles remain unclear, especially in organic systems that rely on soil ecosystem services and biological processes for productivity. Gains in IWP and weed control were evaluated with respect to shifts in soil biological and physicochemical parameters in an organic processing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) agroecosystem. Yield, IWP, and spatial distribution of soil resources and microbial processes were measured in furrow and SSD irrigated organic processing tomato on long term organic fields. Higher IWP and lower weed density under SSD confirm known benefits, while altered distributions of inorganic N, salinity, microbial activity, and C/N cycling enzyme activities as a function of shifts in soil moisture highlight the far-reaching impacts of irrigation management on soil organic C (SOC) and N dynamics regulating resource availability. Decreased macroaggregate formation and greater unprotected C under SSD indicate that altered soil wetting patterns may reduce the C sequestration potential of irrigated land. Previously unknown tradeoffs should be integrated to develop irrigation strategies that maintain current and future sustainability and productivity of organic tomato agroecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据