4.7 Article

Soil properties and agro-physiological responses of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) irrigated by treated domestic wastewater

期刊

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
卷 202, 期 -, 页码 231-240

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.02.003

关键词

Wastewater re-use; Alfalfa; Irrigation; Biochemical parameters; Enzymatic activity

资金

  1. Pole of Competences on Water and Environment (PC2E)
  2. National Centre for Research and Studies on Water and Energy (CNEREE), University of Cadi Ayyad
  3. Tidili Wastewater Reuse and Sewerage Project (PAREUZT) - US-AID

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this experiment is to evaluate the effect of raw and treated wastewater irrigation on soil and plants in comparison to well water. Three plots planted with Medicago sativa L., were irrigated using water of three different qualities over a period of 9 months covering three crop seasons. Physicochemical and microbial parameters were analyzed in water and soil. Agro-physiological, biochemical and antioxidant enzyme traits in the crops were also assessed. Results of agro-physiological parameters show a positive effect on alfalfa irrigated with domestic wastewater compared to well water, while biochemical parameters (stomatal conductance, chlorophyll fluorescence and total chlorophyll content) were adversely affected in alfalfa irrigated with raw wastewater as compared to treated and well water. The plants irrigated with raw wastewater accumulate more proline and sugar than plants irrigated with treated wastewater and well water. The prevalence of antioxidant enzymes (POD, CAT and MDA) in the plants increased with raw wastewater irrigation, however, it remained within the tolerance levels in both plants irrigated by treated wastewater and well water. All three levels of water treatment demonstrated low content of heavy metals in the soil, indicating a lack of availability for the plants. Moreover, the use of treated wastewater improves physicochemical properties and fertility of the soil compared to well water and enhances crop productivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据